diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/rebar_dialyzer_format.erl | 317 |
1 files changed, 176 insertions, 141 deletions
diff --git a/src/rebar_dialyzer_format.erl b/src/rebar_dialyzer_format.erl index ae498bd..e40950f 100644 --- a/src/rebar_dialyzer_format.erl +++ b/src/rebar_dialyzer_format.erl @@ -29,12 +29,14 @@ format(Warning) -> strip(Warning) -> string:strip(Warning, right, $\n). -%%format(Fmt, Args) -> -%% Args2 = [format("~s\033[1;37m", [A]) || A <- Args], -%% format(Fmt, Args2). +%%fmt(Fmt, Args) -> +%% Args2 = [fmt("~s\033[1;37m", [A]) || A <- Args], +%% fmt(Fmt, Args2). -format(Fmt, Args) -> - io_lib:format(lists:flatten(Fmt ++ ?R), Args). +fmt(Fmt) -> + fmt(Fmt, []). +fmt(Fmt, Args) -> + io_lib:format(cfmt(Fmt), Args). %% Mostrly from: https://github.com/erlware/erlware_commons/blob/49bc69e35a282bde4a0a6a8f211b5f77d8585256/src/ec_cmd_log.erl#L220 @@ -42,9 +44,9 @@ format(Fmt, Args) -> %% colorize(Color, false, Msg). %% colorize(Color, false, Msg) when is_integer(Color) -> -%% lists:flatten(format("\033[~B;~Bm~s\033[0m", [0, Color, Msg])); +%% lists:flatten(fmt("\033[~B;~Bm~s\033[0m", [0, Color, Msg])); %% colorize(Color, true, Msg) when is_integer(Color) -> -%% lists:flatten(format("\033[~B;~Bm~s\033[0m", [1, Color, Msg])). +%% lists:flatten(fmt("\033[~B;~Bm~s\033[0m", [1, Color, Msg])). %%bw(M) -> @@ -61,9 +63,43 @@ format_warning({_Tag, {File, Line}, Msg}, FOpt) when is_list(File), basename -> filename:basename(File) end, String = lists:flatten(message_to_string(Msg)), - lists:flatten(format("~s:~w~n~s", [F, Line, String])). + lists:flatten(fmt("~s:~w~n~s", [F, Line, String])). + +cfmt(S) -> + lists:flatten(cfmt_(S)) ++ ?R. + +cfmt_([$~,$!,$! | S]) -> + [?R | cfmt(S)]; + +cfmt_([$~,$!,$r | S]) -> + [?NR | cfmt(S)]; +cfmt_([$~,$!,$R | S]) -> + [?BR | cfmt(S)]; + +cfmt_([$~,$!,$g | S]) -> + [?NG | cfmt(S)]; +cfmt_([$~,$!,$G | S]) -> + [?BG | cfmt(S)]; + +cfmt_([$~,$!,$b | S]) -> + [?NB | cfmt(S)]; +cfmt_([$~,$!,$B | S]) -> + [?BB | cfmt(S)]; + +cfmt_([$~,$!,$w | S]) -> + [?NW | cfmt(S)]; +cfmt_([$~,$!,$W | S]) -> + [?BW | cfmt(S)]; + +cfmt_([$~,$~ | S]) -> + [$~,$~ | cfmt(S)]; +cfmt_([C | S]) -> + [C | cfmt(S)]; +cfmt_([]) -> + []. + %%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- %% Message classification and pretty-printing below. Messages appear in %% categories and in more or less alphabetical ordering within each category. @@ -72,195 +108,195 @@ format_warning({_Tag, {File, Line}, Msg}, FOpt) when is_list(File), %%----- Warnings for general discrepancies ---------------- message_to_string({apply, [Args, ArgNs, FailReason, SigArgs, SigRet, Contract]}) -> - format(?BW"Fun application with arguments "?R"~s ", + fmt("~!WFun application with arguments ~!!~s ", [bad_arg(ArgNs, Args)]) ++ call_or_apply_to_string(ArgNs, FailReason, SigArgs, SigRet, Contract); message_to_string({app_call, [M, F, Args, Culprit, ExpectedType, FoundType]}) -> - format(?BW "The call" ?R " ~s:~s~s " ?BW "requires that" - ?R " ~s " ?BW "is of type " ?NG "~s" ?BW " not " ?NR "~s" - ?R "\n", + fmt("~!WThe call~!! ~s:~s~s ~!Wrequires that" + "~!! ~s ~!Wis of type ~!g~s~!W not ~!r~s" + "~!!\n", [M, F, Args, Culprit, ExpectedType, FoundType]); message_to_string({bin_construction, [Culprit, Size, Seg, Type]}) -> - format(?BW "Binary construction will fail since the"?NB" ~s "?BW"field"?R - " ~s"?BW" in segment"?R" ~s"?BW" has type"?R" ~s\n", + fmt("~!WBinary construction will fail since the ~!b~s~!W field~!!" + " ~s~!W in segment~!! ~s~!W has type~!! ~s\n", [Culprit, Size, Seg, Type]); message_to_string({call, [M, F, Args, ArgNs, FailReason, SigArgs, SigRet, Contract]}) -> - format(?BW "The call" ?R " ~w:~w~s ", [M, F, bad_arg(ArgNs, Args)]) ++ + fmt("~!WThe call~!! ~w:~w~s ", [M, F, bad_arg(ArgNs, Args)]) ++ call_or_apply_to_string(ArgNs, FailReason, SigArgs, SigRet, Contract); message_to_string({call_to_missing, [M, F, A]}) -> - format(?BW"Call to missing or unexported function "?R"~w:~w/~w\n", + fmt("~!WCall to missing or unexported function ~!!~w:~w/~w\n", [M, F, A]); message_to_string({exact_eq, [Type1, Op, Type2]}) -> - format(?BW"The test "?R"~s ~s ~s"?BW" can never evaluate to 'true'\n", + fmt("~!WThe test ~!!~s ~s ~s~!W can never evaluate to 'true'\n", [Type1, Op, Type2]); message_to_string({fun_app_args, [Args, Type]}) -> - format(?BW"Fun application with arguments "?R"~s"?BW" will fail" - " since the function has type "?R"~s\n", [Args, Type]); + fmt("~!WFun application with arguments ~!!~s~!W will fail" + " since the function has type ~!!~s\n", [Args, Type]); message_to_string({fun_app_no_fun, [Op, Type, Arity]}) -> - format(?BW"Fun application will fail since "?R"~s "?BW"::"?R" ~s" - " is not a function of arity "?R"~w\n", [Op, Type, Arity]); + fmt("~!WFun application will fail since ~!!~s ~!W::~!! ~s" + " is not a function of arity ~!!~w\n", [Op, Type, Arity]); message_to_string({guard_fail, []}) -> - ?BW "Clause guard cannot succeed.\n" ?R; + "~!WClause guard cannot succeed.\n~!!"; message_to_string({guard_fail, [Arg1, Infix, Arg2]}) -> - format(?BW "Guard test "?R"~s ~s ~s"?BW" can never succeed\n", + fmt("~!WGuard test ~!!~s ~s ~s~!W can never succeed\n", [Arg1, Infix, Arg2]); message_to_string({neg_guard_fail, [Arg1, Infix, Arg2]}) -> - format(?BW "Guard test not("?R"~s ~s ~s"?BW") can never succeed\n", + fmt("~!WGuard test not(~!!~s ~s ~s~!W) can never succeed\n", [Arg1, Infix, Arg2]); message_to_string({guard_fail, [Guard, Args]}) -> - format(?BW "Guard test "?R"~w~s"?BW" can never succeed\n", + fmt("~!WGuard test ~!!~w~s~!W can never succeed\n", [Guard, Args]); message_to_string({neg_guard_fail, [Guard, Args]}) -> - format(?BW"Guard test not("?R"~w~s"?BW") can never succeed\n", + fmt("~!WGuard test not(~!!~w~s~!W) can never succeed\n", [Guard, Args]); message_to_string({guard_fail_pat, [Pat, Type]}) -> - format(?BW"Clause guard cannot succeed. The "?R"~s"?BW" was matched" - " against the type "?R"~s\n", [Pat, Type]); + fmt("~!WClause guard cannot succeed. The ~!!~s~!W was matched" + " against the type ~!!~s\n", [Pat, Type]); message_to_string({improper_list_constr, [TlType]}) -> - format(?BW "Cons will produce an improper list" - " since its "?NB"2"?R"nd"?BW" argument is"?R" ~s\n", [TlType]); + fmt("~!WCons will produce an improper list" + " since its ~!b2~!!nd~!W argument is~!! ~s\n", [TlType]); message_to_string({no_return, [Type|Name]}) -> NameString = case Name of - [] -> ?BW "The created fun "; - [F, A] -> format(?BW "Function " ?NR "~w/~w ", [F, A]) + [] -> "~!WThe created fun "; + [F, A] -> fmt("~!WFunction ~!r~w/~w ", [F, A]) end, case Type of - no_match -> NameString ++ ?BW "has no clauses that will ever match\n" ?R; - only_explicit -> NameString ++ ?BW "only terminates with explicit exception\n" ?R; - only_normal -> NameString ++ ?BW "has no local return\n" ?R; - both -> NameString ++ ?BW "has no local return\n" ?R + no_match -> fmt("~s~!Whas no clauses that will ever match\n",[NameString]); + only_explicit -> fmt("~s~!Wonly terminates with explicit exception\n", [NameString]); + only_normal -> fmt("~s~!W~!Whas no local return\n", [NameString]); + both -> fmt("~s~!W~!Whas no local return\n", [NameString]) end; message_to_string({record_constr, [RecConstr, FieldDiffs]}) -> - format(?BW"Record construction "?R"~s"?BW" violates the" - " declared type of field "?R"~s\n", [RecConstr, FieldDiffs]); + fmt("~!WRecord construction ~!!~s~!W violates the" + " declared type of field ~!!~s\n", [RecConstr, FieldDiffs]); message_to_string({record_constr, [Name, Field, Type]}) -> - format(?BW"Record construction violates the declared type for "?R"#~w{}" ?BW - " since "?R"~s"?BW" cannot be of type "?R"~s\n", + fmt("~!WRecord construction violates the declared type for ~!!#~w{}~!W" + " since ~!!~s~!W cannot be of type ~!!~s\n", [Name, Field, Type]); message_to_string({record_matching, [String, Name]}) -> - format(?BW"The "?R"~s"?BW" violates the" - " declared type for "?R"#~w{}\n", [String, Name]); + fmt("~!WThe ~!!~s~!W violates the" + " declared type for ~!!#~w{}\n", [String, Name]); message_to_string({record_match, [Pat, Type]}) -> - format(?BW"Matching of "?R"~s"?BW" tagged with a record name violates the" - " declared type of "?R"~s\n", [Pat, Type]); + fmt("~!WMatching of ~!!~s~!W tagged with a record name violates the" + " declared type of ~!!~s\n", [Pat, Type]); message_to_string({pattern_match, [Pat, Type]}) -> - format(?BW"The ~s"?BW" can never match the type "?NG"~s\n", + fmt("~!WThe ~s~!W can never match the type ~!g~s\n", [bad_pat(Pat), Type]); message_to_string({pattern_match_cov, [Pat, Type]}) -> - format(?BW "The ~s"?BW" can never match since previous" - " clauses completely covered the type "?NG"~s\n", + fmt("~!WThe ~s~!W can never match since previous" + " clauses completely covered the type ~!g~s\n", [bad_pat(Pat), Type]); message_to_string({unmatched_return, [Type]}) -> - format(?BW "Expression produces a value of type "?R"~s"?BW"," + fmt("~!WExpression produces a value of type ~!!~s~!W," " but this value is unmatched\n", [Type]); message_to_string({unused_fun, [F, A]}) -> - format(?BW "Function "?NR"~w/~w"?BW" will never be called\n", [F, A]); + fmt("~!WFunction ~!r~w/~w~!W will never be called\n", [F, A]); %%----- Warnings for specs and contracts ------------------- message_to_string({contract_diff, [M, F, _A, Contract, Sig]}) -> - format(?BW"Type specification "?R"~w:~w~s"?BW - " is not equal to the success typing: "?R"~w:~w~s\n", + fmt("~!WType specification ~!!~w:~w~s~!W" + " is not equal to the success typing: ~!!~w:~w~s\n", [M, F, Contract, M, F, Sig]); message_to_string({contract_subtype, [M, F, _A, Contract, Sig]}) -> - format(?BW"Type specification "?R"~w:~w~s"?BW - " is a subtype of the success typing: "?R"~w:~w~s\n", + fmt("~!WType specification ~!!~w:~w~s~!W" + " is a subtype of the success typing: ~!!~w:~w~s\n", [M, F, Contract, M, F, Sig]); message_to_string({contract_supertype, [M, F, _A, Contract, Sig]}) -> - format(?BW"Type specification "?R"~w:~w~s"?BW - " is a supertype of the success typing: "?R"~w:~w~s\n", + fmt("~!WType specification ~!!~w:~w~s~!W" + " is a supertype of the success typing: ~!!~w:~w~s\n", [M, F, Contract, M, F, Sig]); message_to_string({contract_range, [Contract, M, F, ArgStrings, Line, CRet]}) -> - format(?BW"The contract "?R"~w:~w~s"?BW" cannot be right because the" - " inferred return for "?R"~w~s"?BW" on line "?R"~w"?BW" is "?R"~s\n", + fmt("~!WThe contract ~!!~w:~w~s~!W cannot be right because the" + " inferred return for ~!!~w~s~!W on line ~!!~w~!W is ~!!~s\n", [M, F, Contract, F, ArgStrings, Line, CRet]); message_to_string({invalid_contract, [M, F, A, Sig]}) -> - format(?BW "Invalid type specification for function" ?R " ~w:~w/~w." - ?BW " The success typing is" ?R " ~s\n", [M, F, A, Sig]); + fmt("~!WInvalid type specification for function~!! ~w:~w/~w." + "~!W The success typing is~!! ~s\n", [M, F, A, Sig]); message_to_string({extra_range, [M, F, A, ExtraRanges, SigRange]}) -> - format(?BW"The specification for "?R"~w:~w/~w"?BW" states that the function" - " might also return "?R"~s"?BW" but the inferred return is "?R"~s\n", + fmt("~!WThe specification for ~!!~w:~w/~w~!W states that the function" + " might also return ~!!~s~!W but the inferred return is ~!!~s\n", [M, F, A, ExtraRanges, SigRange]); message_to_string({overlapping_contract, [M, F, A]}) -> - format(?BW"Overloaded contract for "?R"~w:~w/~w"?BW" has overlapping" + fmt("~!WOverloaded contract for ~!!~w:~w/~w~!W has overlapping" " domains; such contracts are currently unsupported and are simply " "ignored\n", [M, F, A]); message_to_string({spec_missing_fun, [M, F, A]}) -> - format(?BW"Contract for function that does not exist: "?R"~w:~w/~w\n", + fmt("~!WContract for function that does not exist: ~!!~w:~w/~w\n", [M, F, A]); %%----- Warnings for opaque type violations ------------------- message_to_string({call_with_opaque, [M, F, Args, ArgNs, ExpArgs]}) -> - format(?BW"The call "?R"~w:~w~s"?BW" contains "?R"~s"?BW" when "?R"~s\n", + fmt("~!WThe call ~!!~w:~w~s~!W contains ~!!~s~!W when ~!!~s\n", [M, F, Args, form_positions(ArgNs), form_expected(ExpArgs)]); message_to_string({call_without_opaque, [M, F, Args, [{N,_,_}|_] = ExpectedTriples]}) -> - format([?BW, "The call", ?R, " ~w:~w~s ", ?BW, "does not have" ?R " ~s\n"], - [M, F, bad_arg(N, Args), form_expected_without_opaque(ExpectedTriples)]); + fmt("~!WThe call ~!!~w:~w~s ~!Wdoes not have~!! ~s\n", + [M, F, bad_arg(N, Args), form_expected_without_opaque(ExpectedTriples)]); message_to_string({opaque_eq, [Type, _Op, OpaqueType]}) -> - format(?BW"Attempt to test for equality between a term of type "?R"~s"?BW - " and a term of opaque type "?R"~s\n", [Type, OpaqueType]); + fmt("~!WAttempt to test for equality between a term of type ~!!~s~!W" + " and a term of opaque type ~!!~s\n", [Type, OpaqueType]); message_to_string({opaque_guard, [Arg1, Infix, Arg2, ArgNs]}) -> - format(?BW"Guard test "?R"~s ~s ~s"?BW" contains "?R"~s\n", + fmt("~!WGuard test ~!!~s ~s ~s~!W contains ~!!~s\n", [Arg1, Infix, Arg2, form_positions(ArgNs)]); message_to_string({opaque_guard, [Guard, Args]}) -> - format(?BW"Guard test "?R"~w~s"?BW" breaks the opaqueness of its" + fmt("~!WGuard test ~!!~w~s~!W breaks the opaqueness of its" " argument\n", [Guard, Args]); message_to_string({opaque_match, [Pat, OpaqueType, OpaqueTerm]}) -> Term = if OpaqueType =:= OpaqueTerm -> "the term"; true -> OpaqueTerm end, - format(?BW"The attempt to match a term of type "?R"~s"?BW" against the" - ?R" ~s"?BW" breaks the opaqueness of "?R"~s\n", + fmt("~!WThe attempt to match a term of type ~!!~s~!W against the" + "~!! ~s~!W breaks the opaqueness of ~!!~s\n", [OpaqueType, Pat, Term]); message_to_string({opaque_neq, [Type, _Op, OpaqueType]}) -> - format(?BW"Attempt to test for inequality between a term of type "?R"~s" - ?BW" and a term of opaque type "?R"~s\n", [Type, OpaqueType]); + fmt("~!WAttempt to test for inequality between a term of type ~!!~s" + "~!W and a term of opaque type ~!!~s\n", [Type, OpaqueType]); message_to_string({opaque_type_test, [Fun, Args, Arg, ArgType]}) -> - format(?BW"The type test "?R"~s~s"?BW" breaks the opaqueness of the term " - ?R"~s~s\n", [Fun, Args, Arg, ArgType]); + fmt("~!WThe type test ~!!~s~s~!W breaks the opaqueness of the term " + "~!!~s~s\n", [Fun, Args, Arg, ArgType]); message_to_string({opaque_size, [SizeType, Size]}) -> - format(?BW"The size "?R"~s"?BW" breaks the opaqueness of "?R"~s\n", + fmt("~!WThe size ~!!~s~!W breaks the opaqueness of ~!!~s\n", [SizeType, Size]); message_to_string({opaque_call, [M, F, Args, Culprit, OpaqueType]}) -> - format(?BW"The call "?R"~s:~s~s"?BW" breaks the opaqueness of the term"?R + fmt("~!WThe call ~!!~s:~s~s~!W breaks the opaqueness of the term~!!" " ~s :: ~s\n", [M, F, Args, Culprit, OpaqueType]); %%----- Warnings for concurrency errors -------------------- message_to_string({race_condition, [M, F, Args, Reason]}) -> - format(?BW"The call "?R"~w:~w~s ~s\n", [M, F, Args, Reason]); + fmt("~!WThe call ~!!~w:~w~s ~s\n", [M, F, Args, Reason]); %%----- Warnings for behaviour errors -------------------- message_to_string({callback_type_mismatch, [B, F, A, ST, CT]}) -> - format(?BW"The inferred return type of"?R" ~w/~w (~s) "?BW - "has nothing in common with"?R" ~s, "?BW"which is the expected" - " return type for the callback of"?R" ~w "?BW"behaviour\n", + fmt("~!WThe inferred return type of~!! ~w/~w (~s) ~!W" + "has nothing in common with~!! ~s, ~!Wwhich is the expected" + " return type for the callback of~!! ~w ~!Wbehaviour\n", [F, A, ST, CT, B]); message_to_string({callback_arg_type_mismatch, [B, F, A, N, ST, CT]}) -> - format(?BW"The inferred type for the"?R" ~s "?BW"argument of"?R - " ~w/~w (~s) "?BW"is not a supertype of"?R" ~s"?BW", which is" - "expected type for this argument in the callback of the"?R" ~w " - ?BW"behaviour\n", + fmt("~!WThe inferred type for the~!! ~s ~!Wargument of~!!" + " ~w/~w (~s) ~!Wis not a supertype of~!! ~s~!W, which is" + "expected type for this argument in the callback of the~!! ~w " + "~!Wbehaviour\n", [ordinal(N), F, A, ST, CT, B]); message_to_string({callback_spec_type_mismatch, [B, F, A, ST, CT]}) -> - format(?BW"The return type "?R"~s"?BW" in the specification of "?R - "~w/~w"?BW" is not a subtype of "?R"~s"?BW", which is the expected" - " return type for the callback of "?R"~w"?BW" behaviour\n", + fmt("~!WThe return type ~!!~s~!W in the specification of ~!!" + "~w/~w~!W is not a subtype of ~!!~s~!W, which is the expected" + " return type for the callback of ~!!~w~!W behaviour\n", [ST, F, A, CT, B]); message_to_string({callback_spec_arg_type_mismatch, [B, F, A, N, ST, CT]}) -> - format(?BW"The specified type for the "?R"~s"?BW" argument of "?R - "~w/~w (~s)"?BW" is not a supertype of "?R"~s"?BW", which is" - " expected type for this argument in the callback of the "?R"~w" - ?BW" behaviour\n", [ordinal(N), F, A, ST, CT, B]); + fmt("~!WThe specified type for the ~!!~s~!W argument of ~!!" + "~w/~w (~s)~!W is not a supertype of ~!!~s~!W, which is" + " expected type for this argument in the callback of the ~!!~w" + "~!W behaviour\n", [ordinal(N), F, A, ST, CT, B]); message_to_string({callback_missing, [B, F, A]}) -> - format(?BW"Undefined callback function "?R"~w/~w"?BW" (behaviour " ?R - "'~w'"?BW")\n",[F, A, B]); + fmt("~!WUndefined callback function ~!!~w/~w~!W (behaviour ~!!" + "'~w'~!W)\n",[F, A, B]); message_to_string({callback_info_missing, [B]}) -> - format(?BW "Callback info about the " ?NR "~w" ?BW - " behaviour is not available\n" ?R, [B]); + fmt("~!WCallback info about the ~!r~w~!W" + " behaviour is not available\n", [B]); %%----- Warnings for unknown functions, types, and behaviours ------------- message_to_string({unknown_type, {M, F, A}}) -> - format(?BW"Unknown type "?NR"~w:~w/~w", [M, F, A]); + fmt("~!WUnknown type ~!r~w:~w/~w", [M, F, A]); message_to_string({unknown_function, {M, F, A}}) -> - format(?BW"Unknown function "?NR"~w:~w/~w", [M, F, A]); + fmt("~!WUnknown function ~!r~w:~w/~w", [M, F, A]); message_to_string({unknown_behaviour, B}) -> - format(?BW"Unknown behaviour "?NR"~w", [B]). + fmt("~!WUnknown behaviour ~!r~w", [B]). %%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- %% Auxiliary functions below @@ -274,27 +310,27 @@ call_or_apply_to_string(ArgNs, FailReason, SigArgs, SigRet, case ArgNs =:= [] of true -> %% We do not know which argument(s) caused the failure - format(?BW "will never return since the success typing arguments" - " are " ?R "~s\n", [SigArgs]); + fmt("~!Wwill never return since the success typing arguments" + " are ~!!~s\n", [SigArgs]); false -> - format(?BW "will never return since it differs in the" ?R - " ~s " ?BW "argument from the success typing" - " arguments:" ?R " ~s\n", + fmt("~!Wwill never return since it differs in the~!!" + " ~s ~!Wargument from the success typing" + " arguments:~!! ~s\n", [PositionString, good_arg(ArgNs, SigArgs)]) end; only_contract -> case (ArgNs =:= []) orelse IsOverloaded of true -> %% We do not know which arguments caused the failure - format(?BW "breaks the contract"?R" ~s\n", [Contract]); + fmt("~!Wbreaks the contract~!! ~s\n", [Contract]); false -> - format(?BW "breaks the contract"?R" ~s "?BW"in the"?R - " ~s "?BW"argument\n", + fmt("~!Wbreaks the contract~!! ~s ~!Win the~!!" + " ~s ~!Wargument\n", [good_arg(ArgNs, Contract), PositionString]) end; both -> - format(?BW "will never return since the success typing is " - ?R"~s "?BW"->"?R" ~s " ?BW"and the contract is "?R"~s\n", + fmt("~!Wwill never return since the success typing is " + "~!!~s ~!W->~!! ~s ~!Wand the contract is ~!!~s\n", [good_arg(ArgNs, SigArgs), SigRet, good_arg(ArgNs, Contract)]) end. @@ -312,12 +348,14 @@ form_positions(ArgNs) -> %% We know which positions N are to blame; %% the list of triples will never be empty. form_expected_without_opaque([{N, T, TStr}]) -> - case erl_types:t_is_opaque(T) of - true -> - format([?BW, "an opaque term of type", ?NG, " ~s ", ?BW, "as "], [TStr]); - false -> - format([?BW, "a term of type ", ?NG, "~s ", ?BW, "(with opaque subterms) as "], [TStr]) - end ++ form_position_string([N]) ++ ?BW ++ " argument" ++ ?R; + FStr = case erl_types:t_is_opaque(T) of + true -> + "~!Wan opaque term of type~!g ~s ~!Was "; + false -> + "~!Wa term of type ~!g~s ~!W(with opaque subterms) as " + end ++ form_position_string([N]) ++ "~!W argument", + fmt(FStr, [TStr]); + form_expected_without_opaque(ExpectedTriples) -> %% TODO: can do much better here {ArgNs, _Ts, _TStrs} = lists:unzip3(ExpectedTriples), "opaque terms as " ++ form_position_string(ArgNs) ++ " arguments". @@ -327,10 +365,13 @@ form_expected(ExpectedArgs) -> [T] -> TS = erl_types:t_to_string(T), case erl_types:t_is_opaque(T) of - true -> format("an opaque term of type ~s is expected", [TS]); - false -> format("a structured term of type ~s is expected", [TS]) + true -> fmt("~!Wan opaque term of type ~!!~s~!W is" + " expected", [TS]); + false -> fmt("~!Wa structured term of type ~!!~s~!W is" + " expected", [TS]) end; - [_,_|_] -> "terms of different types are expected in these positions" + [_,_|_] -> fmt("~!Wterms of different types are expected in these" + " positions", []) end. form_position_string(ArgNs) -> @@ -339,30 +380,30 @@ form_position_string(ArgNs) -> [N1] -> ordinal(N1); [_,_|_] -> [Last|Prevs] = lists:reverse(ArgNs), - ", " ++ Head = lists:flatten([format(", ~s",[ordinal(N)]) || + ", " ++ Head = lists:flatten([fmt(", ~s",[ordinal(N)]) || N <- lists:reverse(Prevs)]), Head ++ " and " ++ ordinal(Last) end. -ordinal(1) -> ?BB ++ "1" ++ ?R ++ "st"; -ordinal(2) -> ?BB ++ "2" ++ ?R ++ "nd"; -ordinal(3) -> ?BB ++ "3" ++ ?R ++ "rd"; -ordinal(N) when is_integer(N) -> format(?BB ++ "~w" ++ ?R ++ "th", [N]). +ordinal(1) -> fmt("~!B1~!!st"); +ordinal(2) -> fmt("~!B2~!!nd"); +ordinal(3) -> fmt("~!B3~!!rd"); +ordinal(N) when is_integer(N) -> fmt("~!B~w~!!th", [N]). bad_pat("pattern " ++ P) -> - "pattern " ?NR ++ P ++ ?R; + fmt("pattern ~!r~s",[P]); bad_pat("variable " ++ P) -> - "variable " ?NR ++ P ++ ?R; + fmt("variable ~!r~s",[P]); bad_pat(P) -> - "pattern " ?NR ++ P ++ ?R. + fmt("~!r~s",[P]). bad_arg(N, Args) -> - color_arg(N, ?NR, Args). + color_arg(N, g, Args). good_arg(N, Args) -> - color_arg(N, ?NG, Args). + color_arg(N, r, Args). color_arg(N, C, Args) when is_integer(N) -> color_arg([N], C, Args); color_arg(Ns, C, Args) -> @@ -374,27 +415,21 @@ color_arg(Ns, C, Args) -> highlight([], _N, _C, Rest) -> Rest; -highlight([N | Nr], N, C, [Arg | Rest]) -> - [[C, Arg, ?R] | highlight(Nr, N+1, C, Rest)]; +highlight([N | Nr], N, g, [Arg | Rest]) -> + [fmt("~!g~s", [Arg]) | highlight(Nr, N+1, g, Rest)]; + +highlight([N | Nr], N, r, [Arg | Rest]) -> + [fmt("~!r~s", [Arg]) | highlight(Nr, N+1, r, Rest)]; highlight(Ns, N, C, [Arg | Rest]) -> [Arg | highlight(Ns, N + 1, C, Rest)]. -%% highlight([], _N, _C, Rest) -> -%% [[?NG, A, ?R] || A <- Rest]; - -%% highlight([N | Nr], N, C, [Arg | Rest]) -> -%% [[?NR, Arg, ?R] | highlight(Nr, N+1, C, Rest)]; - -%% highlight(Ns, N, C, [Arg | Rest]) -> -%% [[?NG, Arg, ?R] | highlight(Ns, N + 1, C, Rest)]. - seperate_args([$( | S]) -> seperate_args([], S, "", []). -%% We strip this space since dialyzer is inconsistant in adding or not adding +%% We strip this space since dialyzer is inconsistant in adding or not adding %% it .... seperate_args([], [$,, $\s | R], Arg, Args) -> seperate_args([], R, [], [lists:reverse(Arg) | Args]); |