From d4b76391475ab5ddda80f7799bda3ee1745e8244 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:17:52 +0200
Subject: Print stacktrace in a more conventional way

Insert a newline before printing the stacktrace so that the term is
easier to read and copy. This is a more conventional way to print
traces, and is, for instance, the way it's done by make and python.
---
 src/rebar3.erl | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'src')

diff --git a/src/rebar3.erl b/src/rebar3.erl
index d3ea15f..c665f20 100644
--- a/src/rebar3.erl
+++ b/src/rebar3.erl
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ handle_error(Error) ->
     case erlang:get_stacktrace() of
         [] -> ok;
         Trace ->
-            ?DEBUG("Stack trace to the error location: ~p", [Trace])
+            ?DEBUG("Stack trace to the error location:~n~p", [Trace])
     end,
     ?INFO("When submitting a bug report, please include the output of `rebar3 report \"your command\"`", []),
     erlang:halt(1).
-- 
cgit v1.1