diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | rebar.config | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | rebar.lock | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | src/rebar_dialyzer_format.erl | 227 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | src/rebar_prv_dialyzer.erl | 8 |
4 files changed, 130 insertions, 109 deletions
diff --git a/rebar.config b/rebar.config index a0234e4..5e4df84 100644 --- a/rebar.config +++ b/rebar.config @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ {getopt, "0.8.2"}, {bbmustache, "1.0.4"}, {relx, "3.7.1"}, - {cf, "0.1.1"}]}. + {cf, "0.1.2"}]}. {escript_name, rebar3}. {escript_emu_args, "%%! +sbtu +A0\n"}. @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ [{<<"bbmustache">>,{pkg,<<"bbmustache">>,<<"1.0.4">>},0}, {<<"certifi">>,{pkg,<<"certifi">>,<<"0.1.1">>},0}, - {<<"cf">>,{pkg,<<"cf">>,<<"0.1.1">>},0}, + {<<"cf">>,{pkg,<<"cf">>,<<"0.1.2">>},0}, {<<"erlware_commons">>,{pkg,<<"erlware_commons">>,<<"0.16.0">>},0}, {<<"getopt">>,{pkg,<<"getopt">>,<<"0.8.2">>},0}, {<<"providers">>,{pkg,<<"providers">>,<<"1.5.0">>},0}, diff --git a/src/rebar_dialyzer_format.erl b/src/rebar_dialyzer_format.erl index 0fd2b6e..b30c4dc 100644 --- a/src/rebar_dialyzer_format.erl +++ b/src/rebar_dialyzer_format.erl @@ -1,42 +1,67 @@ +%%% +%%% General colour conventions mostly follow the same schema +%%% that git uses: +%%% +%%% * cyan: files/lines or locations in general +%%% * bold: important text i.e. the human parts of warnings +%%% this allows quickly 'scanning' over a warning fading +%%% out the cody bits +%%% * red: things that went bad, i.e. the wrong argument in a +%%% call. It allows to quickly catching where in the code +%%% ane error is. +%%% * green: the 'good' stuff, i.e. what was expected as an argument +%%% the 'red vs green' resambles the diff view 'remove vs add' +%%% * blue: argument positions. -module(rebar_dialyzer_format). -include("rebar.hrl"). --export([format/1]). - - -format(Warning) -> - Str = try - format_warning(Warning, fullpath) - catch - Error:Reason -> - ?DEBUG("Failed to pretty format warning: ~p:~p", - [Error, Reason]), - dialyzer:format_warning(Warning, fullpath) - end, - case strip(Str) of - ":0: " ++ Unknown -> - Unknown; - Warning1 -> - Warning1 - end. +-export([format_warnings/1]). + +%% Formats a list of warnings in a nice per file way. Note that we reverse +%% the list at the end to 'undo' the reversal by foldl +format_warnings(Warnings) -> + {_, Res} = lists:foldl(fun format_warning_/2, {undefined, []}, Warnings), + lists:reverse(Res). + + +%% If the last seen file is and the file of this warning are the same +%% we skip the file header +format_warning_(Warning = {_Tag, {File, Line}, Msg}, {File, Acc}) -> + try + String = message_to_string(Msg), + {File, [lists:flatten(fmt("~!c~4w~!!: ~s", [Line, String])) | Acc]} + catch + Error:Reason -> + ?DEBUG("Failed to pretty format warning: ~p:~p", + [Error, Reason]), + {File, [dialyzer:format_warning(Warning, fullpath) | Acc]} + end; -strip(Warning) -> - string:strip(Warning, right, $\n). +%% With a new file detencted we also write a file header. +format_warning_(Warning = {_Tag, {File, Line}, Msg}, {_LastFile, Acc}) -> + try + Base = filename:basename(File), + Dir = filename:dirname(File), + Root = filename:rootname(Base), + Ext = filename:extension(Base), + Path = re:replace(Dir, "^.*/_build/", "_build/", [{return, list}]), + Base1 = fmt("~!_c~s~!!~!__~s", [Root, Ext]), + F = fmt("~!__~s", [filename:join(Path, Base1)]), + String = message_to_string(Msg), + {File, [lists:flatten(fmt("~n~s~n~!c~4w~!!: ~s", [F, Line, String])) | Acc]} + catch + Error:Reason -> + ?DEBUG("Failed to pretty format warning: ~p:~p~n~p", + [Error, Reason, erlang:get_stacktrace()]), + {File, [dialyzer:format_warning(Warning, fullpath) | Acc]} + end. fmt(Fmt) -> cf:format(Fmt, []). fmt(Fmt, Args) -> cf:format(Fmt, Args). -format_warning({Tag, {File, Line, _MFA}, Msg}, FOpt) -> - format_warning({Tag, {File, Line}, Msg}, FOpt); -format_warning({_Tag, {File, Line}, Msg}, fullpath) when is_list(File), - is_integer(Line) -> - F = re:replace(File, "^.*/_build/", "_build/"), - String = lists:flatten(message_to_string(Msg)), - lists:flatten(fmt("~s:~w~n~s", [F, Line, String])). - %%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- %% Message classification and pretty-printing below. Messages appear in %% categories and in more or less alphabetical ordering within each category. @@ -50,49 +75,48 @@ message_to_string({apply, [Args, ArgNs, FailReason, call_or_apply_to_string(ArgNs, FailReason, SigArgs, SigRet, Contract); message_to_string({app_call, [M, F, Args, Culprit, ExpectedType, FoundType]}) -> fmt("~!^The call~!! ~s:~s~s ~!^requires that" - "~!! ~s ~!^is of type ~!g~s~!^ not ~!r~s" - "~!!\n", + "~!! ~s ~!^is of type ~!g~s~!^ not ~!r~s", [M, F, Args, Culprit, ExpectedType, FoundType]); message_to_string({bin_construction, [Culprit, Size, Seg, Type]}) -> fmt("~!^Binary construction will fail since the ~!b~s~!^ field~!!" - " ~s~!^ in segment~!! ~s~!^ has type~!! ~s\n", + " ~s~!^ in segment~!! ~s~!^ has type~!! ~s", [Culprit, Size, Seg, Type]); message_to_string({call, [M, F, Args, ArgNs, FailReason, SigArgs, SigRet, Contract]}) -> fmt("~!^The call~!! ~w:~w~s ", [M, F, bad_arg(ArgNs, Args)]) ++ call_or_apply_to_string(ArgNs, FailReason, SigArgs, SigRet, Contract); message_to_string({call_to_missing, [M, F, A]}) -> - fmt("~!^Call to missing or unexported function ~!!~w:~w/~w\n", + fmt("~!^Call to missing or unexported function ~!!~w:~w/~w", [M, F, A]); message_to_string({exact_eq, [Type1, Op, Type2]}) -> - fmt("~!^The test ~!!~s ~s ~s~!^ can never evaluate to 'true'\n", + fmt("~!^The test ~!!~s ~s ~s~!^ can never evaluate to 'true'", [Type1, Op, Type2]); message_to_string({fun_app_args, [Args, Type]}) -> fmt("~!^Fun application with arguments ~!!~s~!^ will fail" - " since the function has type ~!!~s\n", [Args, Type]); + " since the function has type ~!!~s", [Args, Type]); message_to_string({fun_app_no_fun, [Op, Type, Arity]}) -> fmt("~!^Fun application will fail since ~!!~s ~!^::~!! ~s" - " is not a function of arity ~!!~w\n", [Op, Type, Arity]); + " is not a function of arity ~!!~w", [Op, Type, Arity]); message_to_string({guard_fail, []}) -> - "~!^Clause guard cannot succeed.\n~!!"; + "~!^Clause guard cannot succeed.~!!"; message_to_string({guard_fail, [Arg1, Infix, Arg2]}) -> - fmt("~!^Guard test ~!!~s ~s ~s~!^ can never succeed\n", + fmt("~!^Guard test ~!!~s ~s ~s~!^ can never succeed", [Arg1, Infix, Arg2]); message_to_string({neg_guard_fail, [Arg1, Infix, Arg2]}) -> - fmt("~!^Guard test not(~!!~s ~s ~s~!^) can never succeed\n", + fmt("~!^Guard test not(~!!~s ~s ~s~!^) can never succeed", [Arg1, Infix, Arg2]); message_to_string({guard_fail, [Guard, Args]}) -> - fmt("~!^Guard test ~!!~w~s~!^ can never succeed\n", + fmt("~!^Guard test ~!!~w~s~!^ can never succeed", [Guard, Args]); message_to_string({neg_guard_fail, [Guard, Args]}) -> - fmt("~!^Guard test not(~!!~w~s~!^) can never succeed\n", + fmt("~!^Guard test not(~!!~w~s~!^) can never succeed", [Guard, Args]); message_to_string({guard_fail_pat, [Pat, Type]}) -> fmt("~!^Clause guard cannot succeed. The ~!!~s~!^ was matched" - " against the type ~!!~s\n", [Pat, Type]); + " against the type ~!!~s", [Pat, Type]); message_to_string({improper_list_constr, [TlType]}) -> fmt("~!^Cons will produce an improper list" - " since its ~!b2~!!nd~!^ argument is~!! ~s\n", [TlType]); + " since its ~!b2~!!nd~!^ argument is~!! ~s", [TlType]); message_to_string({no_return, [Type|Name]}) -> NameString = case Name of @@ -100,133 +124,133 @@ message_to_string({no_return, [Type|Name]}) -> [F, A] -> fmt("~!^Function ~!r~w/~w ", [F, A]) end, case Type of - no_match -> fmt("~s~!^has no clauses that will ever match\n",[NameString]); - only_explicit -> fmt("~s~!^only terminates with explicit exception\n", [NameString]); - only_normal -> fmt("~s~!^has no local return\n", [NameString]); - both -> fmt("~s~!^has no local return\n", [NameString]) + no_match -> fmt("~s~!^has no clauses that will ever match",[NameString]); + only_explicit -> fmt("~s~!^only terminates with explicit exception", [NameString]); + only_normal -> fmt("~s~!^has no local return", [NameString]); + both -> fmt("~s~!^has no local return", [NameString]) end; message_to_string({record_constr, [RecConstr, FieldDiffs]}) -> fmt("~!^Record construction ~!!~s~!^ violates the" - " declared type of field ~!!~s\n", [RecConstr, FieldDiffs]); + " declared type of field ~!!~s", [RecConstr, FieldDiffs]); message_to_string({record_constr, [Name, Field, Type]}) -> fmt("~!^Record construction violates the declared type for ~!!#~w{}~!^" - " since ~!!~s~!^ cannot be of type ~!!~s\n", + " since ~!!~s~!^ cannot be of type ~!!~s", [Name, Field, Type]); message_to_string({record_matching, [String, Name]}) -> fmt("~!^The ~!!~s~!^ violates the" - " declared type for ~!!#~w{}\n", [String, Name]); + " declared type for ~!!#~w{}", [String, Name]); message_to_string({record_match, [Pat, Type]}) -> fmt("~!^Matching of ~!!~s~!^ tagged with a record name violates the" - " declared type of ~!!~s\n", [Pat, Type]); + " declared type of ~!!~s", [Pat, Type]); message_to_string({pattern_match, [Pat, Type]}) -> - fmt("~!^The ~s~!^ can never match the type ~!g~s\n", + fmt("~!^The ~s~!^ can never match the type ~!g~s", [bad_pat(Pat), Type]); message_to_string({pattern_match_cov, [Pat, Type]}) -> fmt("~!^The ~s~!^ can never match since previous" - " clauses completely covered the type ~!g~s\n", + " clauses completely covered the type ~!g~s", [bad_pat(Pat), Type]); message_to_string({unmatched_return, [Type]}) -> fmt("~!^Expression produces a value of type ~!!~s~!^," - " but this value is unmatched\n", [Type]); + " but this value is unmatched", [Type]); message_to_string({unused_fun, [F, A]}) -> - fmt("~!^Function ~!r~w/~w~!^ will never be called\n", [F, A]); + fmt("~!^Function ~!r~w/~w~!!~!^ will never be called", [F, A]); %%----- Warnings for specs and contracts ------------------- message_to_string({contract_diff, [M, F, _A, Contract, Sig]}) -> fmt("~!^Type specification ~!!~w:~w~s~!^" - " is not equal to the success typing: ~!!~w:~w~s\n", + " is not equal to the success typing: ~!!~w:~w~s", [M, F, Contract, M, F, Sig]); message_to_string({contract_subtype, [M, F, _A, Contract, Sig]}) -> fmt("~!^Type specification ~!!~w:~w~s~!^" - " is a subtype of the success typing: ~!!~w:~w~s\n", + " is a subtype of the success typing: ~!!~w:~w~s", [M, F, Contract, M, F, Sig]); message_to_string({contract_supertype, [M, F, _A, Contract, Sig]}) -> fmt("~!^Type specification ~!!~w:~w~s~!^" - " is a supertype of the success typing: ~!!~w:~w~s\n", + " is a supertype of the success typing: ~!!~w:~w~s", [M, F, Contract, M, F, Sig]); message_to_string({contract_range, [Contract, M, F, ArgStrings, Line, CRet]}) -> fmt("~!^The contract ~!!~w:~w~s~!^ cannot be right because the" - " inferred return for ~!!~w~s~!^ on line ~!!~w~!^ is ~!!~s\n", + " inferred return for ~!!~w~s~!^ on line ~!!~w~!^ is ~!!~s", [M, F, Contract, F, ArgStrings, Line, CRet]); message_to_string({invalid_contract, [M, F, A, Sig]}) -> fmt("~!^Invalid type specification for function~!! ~w:~w/~w." - "~!^ The success typing is~!! ~s\n", [M, F, A, Sig]); + "~!^ The success typing is~!! ~s", [M, F, A, Sig]); message_to_string({extra_range, [M, F, A, ExtraRanges, SigRange]}) -> fmt("~!^The specification for ~!!~w:~w/~w~!^ states that the function" - " might also return ~!!~s~!^ but the inferred return is ~!!~s\n", + " might also return ~!!~s~!^ but the inferred return is ~!!~s", [M, F, A, ExtraRanges, SigRange]); message_to_string({overlapping_contract, [M, F, A]}) -> fmt("~!^Overloaded contract for ~!!~w:~w/~w~!^ has overlapping" " domains; such contracts are currently unsupported and are simply " - "ignored\n", [M, F, A]); + "ignored", [M, F, A]); message_to_string({spec_missing_fun, [M, F, A]}) -> - fmt("~!^Contract for function that does not exist: ~!!~w:~w/~w\n", + fmt("~!^Contract for function that does not exist: ~!!~w:~w/~w", [M, F, A]); %%----- Warnings for opaque type violations ------------------- message_to_string({call_with_opaque, [M, F, Args, ArgNs, ExpArgs]}) -> - fmt("~!^The call ~!!~w:~w~s~!^ contains ~!!~s~!^ when ~!!~s\n", - [M, F, Args, form_positions(ArgNs), form_expected(ExpArgs)]); + fmt("~!^The call ~!!~w:~w~s~!^ contains ~!!~s~!^ when ~!!~s", + [M, F, bad_arg(ArgNs, Args), form_positions(ArgNs), form_expected(ExpArgs)]); message_to_string({call_without_opaque, [M, F, Args, [{N,_,_}|_] = ExpectedTriples]}) -> - fmt("~!^The call ~!!~w:~w~s ~!^does not have~!! ~s\n", + fmt("~!^The call ~!!~w:~w~s ~!^does not have~!! ~s", [M, F, bad_arg(N, Args), form_expected_without_opaque(ExpectedTriples)]); message_to_string({opaque_eq, [Type, _Op, OpaqueType]}) -> fmt("~!^Attempt to test for equality between a term of type ~!!~s~!^" - " and a term of opaque type ~!!~s\n", [Type, OpaqueType]); + " and a term of opaque type ~!!~s", [Type, OpaqueType]); message_to_string({opaque_guard, [Arg1, Infix, Arg2, ArgNs]}) -> - fmt("~!^Guard test ~!!~s ~s ~s~!^ contains ~!!~s\n", + fmt("~!^Guard test ~!!~s ~s ~s~!^ contains ~!!~s", [Arg1, Infix, Arg2, form_positions(ArgNs)]); message_to_string({opaque_guard, [Guard, Args]}) -> fmt("~!^Guard test ~!!~w~s~!^ breaks the opaqueness of its" - " argument\n", [Guard, Args]); + " argument", [Guard, Args]); message_to_string({opaque_match, [Pat, OpaqueType, OpaqueTerm]}) -> Term = if OpaqueType =:= OpaqueTerm -> "the term"; true -> OpaqueTerm end, fmt("~!^The attempt to match a term of type ~!!~s~!^ against the" - "~!! ~s~!^ breaks the opaqueness of ~!!~s\n", + "~!! ~s~!^ breaks the opaqueness of ~!!~s", [OpaqueType, Pat, Term]); message_to_string({opaque_neq, [Type, _Op, OpaqueType]}) -> fmt("~!^Attempt to test for inequality between a term of type ~!!~s" - "~!^ and a term of opaque type ~!!~s\n", [Type, OpaqueType]); + "~!^ and a term of opaque type ~!!~s", [Type, OpaqueType]); message_to_string({opaque_type_test, [Fun, Args, Arg, ArgType]}) -> fmt("~!^The type test ~!!~s~s~!^ breaks the opaqueness of the term " - "~!!~s~s\n", [Fun, Args, Arg, ArgType]); + "~!!~s~s", [Fun, Args, Arg, ArgType]); message_to_string({opaque_size, [SizeType, Size]}) -> - fmt("~!^The size ~!!~s~!^ breaks the opaqueness of ~!!~s\n", + fmt("~!^The size ~!!~s~!^ breaks the opaqueness of ~!!~s", [SizeType, Size]); message_to_string({opaque_call, [M, F, Args, Culprit, OpaqueType]}) -> fmt("~!^The call ~!!~s:~s~s~!^ breaks the opaqueness of the term~!!" - " ~s :: ~s\n", [M, F, Args, Culprit, OpaqueType]); + " ~s :: ~s", [M, F, Args, Culprit, OpaqueType]); %%----- Warnings for concurrency errors -------------------- message_to_string({race_condition, [M, F, Args, Reason]}) -> - fmt("~!^The call ~!!~w:~w~s ~s\n", [M, F, Args, Reason]); + fmt("~!^The call ~!!~w:~w~s ~s", [M, F, Args, Reason]); %%----- Warnings for behaviour errors -------------------- message_to_string({callback_type_mismatch, [B, F, A, ST, CT]}) -> fmt("~!^The inferred return type of~!! ~w/~w (~s) ~!^" "has nothing in common with~!! ~s, ~!^which is the expected" - " return type for the callback of~!! ~w ~!^behaviour\n", + " return type for the callback of~!! ~w ~!^behaviour", [F, A, ST, CT, B]); message_to_string({callback_arg_type_mismatch, [B, F, A, N, ST, CT]}) -> fmt("~!^The inferred type for the~!! ~s ~!^argument of~!!" " ~w/~w (~s) ~!^is not a supertype of~!! ~s~!^, which is" "expected type for this argument in the callback of the~!! ~w " - "~!^behaviour\n", + "~!^behaviour", [ordinal(N), F, A, ST, CT, B]); message_to_string({callback_spec_type_mismatch, [B, F, A, ST, CT]}) -> fmt("~!^The return type ~!!~s~!^ in the specification of ~!!" "~w/~w~!^ is not a subtype of ~!!~s~!^, which is the expected" - " return type for the callback of ~!!~w~!^ behaviour\n", + " return type for the callback of ~!!~w~!^ behaviour", [ST, F, A, CT, B]); message_to_string({callback_spec_arg_type_mismatch, [B, F, A, N, ST, CT]}) -> fmt("~!^The specified type for the ~!!~s~!^ argument of ~!!" "~w/~w (~s)~!^ is not a supertype of ~!!~s~!^, which is" " expected type for this argument in the callback of the ~!!~w" - "~!^ behaviour\n", [ordinal(N), F, A, ST, CT, B]); + "~!^ behaviour", [ordinal(N), F, A, ST, CT, B]); message_to_string({callback_missing, [B, F, A]}) -> fmt("~!^Undefined callback function ~!!~w/~w~!^ (behaviour ~!!" - "'~w'~!^)\n",[F, A, B]); + "'~w'~!^)",[F, A, B]); message_to_string({callback_info_missing, [B]}) -> - fmt("~!^Callback info about the ~!r~w~!^" - " behaviour is not available\n", [B]); + fmt("~!^Callback info about the ~!r~w~!!~!^" + " behaviour is not available", [B]); %%----- Warnings for unknown functions, types, and behaviours ------------- message_to_string({unknown_type, {M, F, A}}) -> fmt("~!^Unknown type ~!r~w:~w/~w", [M, F, A]); @@ -248,39 +272,36 @@ call_or_apply_to_string(ArgNs, FailReason, SigArgs, SigRet, true -> %% We do not know which argument(s) caused the failure fmt("~!^will never return since the success typing arguments" - " are ~!!~s\n", [SigArgs]); + " are ~!!~s", [SigArgs]); false -> fmt("~!^will never return since it differs in the~!!" " ~s ~!^argument from the success typing" - " arguments:~!! ~s\n", + " arguments:~!! ~s", [PositionString, good_arg(ArgNs, SigArgs)]) end; only_contract -> case (ArgNs =:= []) orelse IsOverloaded of true -> %% We do not know which arguments caused the failure - fmt("~!^breaks the contract~!! ~s\n", [good_arg(ArgNs, Contract)]); + fmt("~!^breaks the contract~!! ~s", [good_arg(ArgNs, Contract)]); false -> fmt("~!^breaks the contract~!! ~s ~!^in the~!!" - " ~s ~!^argument\n", + " ~s ~!^argument", [good_arg(ArgNs, Contract), PositionString]) end; both -> fmt("~!^will never return since the success typing is " - "~!!~s ~!^->~!! ~s ~!^and the contract is ~!!~s\n", + "~!!~s ~!^->~!! ~s ~!^and the contract is ~!!~s", [good_arg(ArgNs, SigArgs), SigRet, good_arg(ArgNs, Contract)]) end. form_positions(ArgNs) -> + ArgS = form_position_string(ArgNs), case ArgNs of - [_] -> "an opaque term as "; - [_,_|_] -> "opaque terms as " - end ++ form_position_string(ArgNs) ++ - case ArgNs of - [_] -> " argument"; - [_,_|_] -> " arguments" - end. + [_] -> fmt("~!^an opaque term as ~!!~s~!^ argument", [ArgS]); + [_,_|_] -> fmt("~!^opaque terms as ~!!~s~!^ arguments", [ArgS]) + end. %% We know which positions N are to blame; %% the list of triples will never be empty. @@ -327,7 +348,7 @@ ordinal(2) -> fmt("~!B2~!!nd"); ordinal(3) -> fmt("~!B3~!!rd"); ordinal(N) when is_integer(N) -> fmt("~!B~w~!!th", [N]). - +%% Format a pattern ad highlight errorous part in red. bad_pat("pattern " ++ P) -> fmt("pattern ~!r~s",[P]); bad_pat("variable " ++ P) -> @@ -337,14 +358,16 @@ bad_pat(P) -> bad_arg(N, Args) -> - color_arg(N, r, Args). + colour_arg(N, r, Args). good_arg(N, Args) -> - color_arg(N, g, Args). + colour_arg(N, g, Args). -color_arg(N, C, Args) when is_integer(N) -> - color_arg([N], C, Args); -color_arg(Ns, C, Args) -> +%% colour one or more arg of an argument list, this unparses the args +%% highlights one or more of them and puts them back together. +colour_arg(N, C, Args) when is_integer(N) -> + colour_arg([N], C, Args); +colour_arg(Ns, C, Args) -> {Args1, Rest} =seperate_args(Args), Args2 = highlight(Ns, 1, C, Args1), join_args(Args2) ++ Rest. @@ -361,11 +384,13 @@ highlight([N | Nr], N, r, [Arg | Rest]) -> highlight(Ns, N, C, [Arg | Rest]) -> [Arg | highlight(Ns, N + 1, C, Rest)]. +%% Arugments to functions and constraints are passed as +%% strings not as data, this function pulls them apart +%% to allow interacting with them seperately and not +%% as one bug chunk of data. seperate_args([$( | S]) -> seperate_args([], S, "", []). - - %% We strip this space since dialyzer is inconsistant in adding or not adding %% it .... seperate_args([], [$,, $\s | R], Arg, Args) -> diff --git a/src/rebar_prv_dialyzer.erl b/src/rebar_prv_dialyzer.erl index 7cf7e28..487e9d1 100644 --- a/src/rebar_prv_dialyzer.erl +++ b/src/rebar_prv_dialyzer.erl @@ -402,14 +402,10 @@ run_dialyzer(State, Opts, Output) -> end. format_warnings(Output, Warnings) -> - Warnings1 = format_warnings(Warnings), + Warnings1 = rebar_dialyzer_format:format_warnings(Warnings), console_warnings(Warnings1), file_warnings(Output, Warnings), - length(Warnings1). - -format_warnings(Warnings) -> - [rebar_dialyzer_format:format(Warning) || Warning <- Warnings]. - + length(Warnings). console_warnings(Warnings) -> _ = [?CONSOLE("~s", [Warning]) || Warning <- Warnings], |